diff --git a/config/quality/complexity-baseline.json b/config/quality/complexity-baseline.json
index 6ba29644bc..f8f69bb98b 100644
--- a/config/quality/complexity-baseline.json
+++ b/config/quality/complexity-baseline.json
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "_comment": "Catraca de complexidade (check-complexity.mjs, ESLint core rules complexity>=15 e max-lines-per-function>80 sobre src+open-sse+electron+bin via eslint.complexity.config.mjs). Conta total de violacoes; so pode cair. --update ratcheta.",
-  "count": 1888,
+  "count": 1890,
+  "_rebaseline_2026_06_19_lote3_merge_drift": "Reconciliacao release-volatil pos-merge do lote de 13 PRs (release/v3.8.30): 1888->1890 (+2). Drift de condicionais NOVOS trazidos por #4313 (5 harvested features — combo allowlist intersection, serviceKind filter) e #4323 (compression e2e — novos ramos em ultra/aggressive/gcf/strategySelector), merges que entraram DEPOIS do #4318 medir 1888. O fast-path do release nao roda check:complexity (so release->main), entao os ramos acumulam sem rebaselinar. Medido no tip real da release pos-merge com `node scripts/check/check-complexity.mjs`. Mesma familia dos rebaselines anteriores — crescimento de feature legitimo, nao regressao; reducao fica como debt de refactor dedicado.",
   "_rebaseline_2026_06_19_bin_scope_wired": "Task 6A.11 (de verdade): o ESLINT_ARGS de check-complexity.mjs passava apenas `src open-sse` — o config eslint.complexity.config.mjs e este baseline JA documentavam o escopo src+open-sse+electron+bin, mas a edicao do scan nunca tinha sido aplicada (fake-green: o gate alegava cobrir bin/electron e nunca os varria). Agora ESLINT_ARGS passa `src open-sse electron bin`, casando o config. Medido: electron+bin contribuem 0 violacoes (electron so tem types.d.ts, ignorado; os 4 .ts de bin/ estao sob os thresholds) — o widening e 0-custo. O +1 (1887->1888) NAO vem do widening: e drift pre-existente em src/open-sse trazido pela base release/v3.8.30 a23d0d678 (merges do ciclo, incl. #4308 cache-hit-cost), que o fast-path do release nao rebaselina (check:complexity so roda no release->main). Mesma familia dos rebaselines anteriores — crescimento de feature legitimo, nao regressao.",
   "_rebaseline_2026_06_19_4293_codex_spark_scope": "PR #4293 (isolate Codex Spark quota scope): +2 over the v3.8.30 baseline (1885->1887). Measured on the actual merged tree (release/v3.8.30 + #4293), not the PR's own estimate. The thin requestedModel-scoped Codex quota headroom/preflight branches needed so GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark and normal Codex are evaluated independently add the new conditional cost; heavy parsing/display logic was extracted to leaf helpers under the cap (codexQuotaScopes.ts, codexUsageQuotas.ts, codexFailover.ts). Legitimate feature growth, not regression; structural shrink remains debt.",
   "_rebaseline_2026_06_19_v3830": "Re-baseline consciente: drift 1800->1885 (+85) do ciclo v3.8.25->v3.8.29 (round-9, ~130 PRs: combo split D7/D8, chatCore split, novos providers/modelos, cost-telemetry, MITM decrypt, remote-mode CLI). Medido no tip release/v3.8.30 (3e6be4701). Mesma familia dos re-baselines anteriores — crescimento de feature legitima, nao regressao. Reducao fica como debt de refactor dedicado.",