mirror of
https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute.git
synced 2026-09-20 22:02:19 +03:00
* remove: drop sunset MiMoCode provider from model catalog * remove: drop sunset MiMoCode provider from model catalog (shared.ts) Remove unused imports, types, and comments from shared.ts. * remove: MiMoCode provider (Xiaomi sunset) — executor, registry, no-auth config, icon, tests * refactor(providers): finish MiMoCode removal — sweep remaining no-auth references Drop the leftover mimocode entries from the no-auth provider controls, the translate-path snapshot, the eslint suppressions, and the #3061 auth-loop test. Re-point the fingerprint-pin (#6696) and proxy-noauth (#6272) tests at opencode, which exercises the same fingerprint path, so the removal does not break runtime behavior. Co-authored-by: diegosouzapw <8016841+diegosouzapw@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(providers): reconcile provider/executor counts after MiMoCode sunset The base's parallel doc-count sync (#10433) pinned 340 providers / 101 executors. With mimocode removed, live code has 339 providers and 100 executors; refresh the user-facing counts (package.json description, llm.txt, README/AGENTS, i18n llm.txt, provider reference, diagrams) so the check-docs-counts STRICT gate stays green. Co-authored-by: diegosouzapw <diegosouza.pw@gmail.com> * test(providers): fix orphaned mimocode references after MiMoCode sunset The sunset removed mimocode/mcode from the free-onboarding candidates and from FINGERPRINT_PROVIDERS, but two tests still referenced them: - free-provider-onboarding-setup: the mimocode->theoldllm substitution introduced duplicate 'opencode' rows (impossible given the request-set dedupe) and the wrong display name; align expectations with the actual {opencode, theoldllm} dedupe behavior and 'The Old LLM (Free)' name. - combo-system-prompt-templates-5501: resolveTargetFingerprint tested with provider 'mcode', which is no longer a fingerprint provider; point it at the remaining fingerprint provider 'opencode'. Co-authored-by: diegosouzapw <diegosouza.pw@gmail.com> --------- Co-authored-by: diegosouzapw <diegosouzapw@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tushar49 <Tushar49@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: diegosouzapw <8016841+diegosouzapw@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: adevwithpurpose <adevwithpurpose@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: diegosouzapw <diegosouza.pw@gmail.com>
45 lines
2.1 KiB
TypeScript
45 lines
2.1 KiB
TypeScript
import test from "node:test";
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
|
|
// #4976 — A 400 response whose body carries rate-limit semantics (e.g. MiMoCode's
|
|
// "Detected high-frequency non-compliant requests from you.") was misclassified as a
|
|
// non-fallbackable generic 400, so MiMo-auto combo never failed over and the raw
|
|
// failure surfaced to Cline as `[502]: fetch failed`. checkFallbackError must now
|
|
// detect rate-limit text on a 400 and treat it as fallback-worthy
|
|
// (RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED, connection-cooldown scope) WITHOUT regressing the #2101
|
|
// malformed-400 infinite-loop guard.
|
|
|
|
const { checkFallbackError } = await import("../../open-sse/services/accountFallback.ts");
|
|
const { RateLimitReason } = await import("../../open-sse/config/constants.ts");
|
|
|
|
test("#4976 400 with rate-limit text (MiMoCode) → fallback with RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED", () => {
|
|
const res = checkFallbackError(
|
|
400,
|
|
"Detected high-frequency non-compliant requests from you.",
|
|
0,
|
|
null,
|
|
"theoldllm"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(res.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(res.reason, RateLimitReason.RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("#4976 400 with Chinese rate-limit text → fallback with RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED", () => {
|
|
const res = checkFallbackError(400, "检测到您的请求频率过高,请稍后再试", 0, null, "theoldllm");
|
|
assert.equal(res.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(res.reason, RateLimitReason.RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("#4976 regression: a generic non-rate-limit 400 still does NOT fall over (#2101 guard)", () => {
|
|
const res = checkFallbackError(400, "Invalid JSON: unexpected token at position 12");
|
|
assert.equal(res.shouldFallback, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("#4976 regression: a malformed 400 stays MODEL_CAPACITY, not reclassified as rate-limit", () => {
|
|
// Malformed-request detection must win over the new rate-limit text check so the
|
|
// #2101 infinite-loop guard (zero-cooldown MODEL_CAPACITY) is preserved.
|
|
const res = checkFallbackError(400, "messages must alternate between user and assistant");
|
|
assert.equal(res.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(res.reason, RateLimitReason.MODEL_CAPACITY);
|
|
});
|