mirror of
https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute.git
synced 2026-09-15 11:22:15 +03:00
Validado em lote numa worktree combinada com os 4 PRs desta leva sobre o tip de `release/v3.8.51`: `typecheck:core` limpo e **119/119** nos 9 arquivos de teste que trazem. Três dos quatro conflitavam apenas no `config/quality/file-size-baseline.json`, todos de forma aditiva (chaves `_rebaseline_` distintas que devem coexistir); resolvidos com validação de JSON a cada passo. Registro que o **#12637 não é duplicata do #12566**, apesar do título quase idêntico: o autor documenta que aquele escopou o cooldown de preflight por família e este cobre o `genericQuotaFetcher`, que é o que o roteamento reset-aware efetivamente chama. Traz também validação ao vivo em VPS (imagem X500, `onmi-gemini3.6` → HTTP 200), satisfazendo a Hard Rule #18. Obrigado, @HouMinXi.
187 lines
7.1 KiB
TypeScript
187 lines
7.1 KiB
TypeScript
import { test } from "node:test";
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import {
|
|
classifyProviderBreakerResult,
|
|
shouldTripProviderBreakerForResult,
|
|
} from "../../src/sse/handlers/chatPredicates.ts";
|
|
import {
|
|
recordProviderFailure,
|
|
clearProviderFailure,
|
|
isProviderInCooldown,
|
|
} from "../../open-sse/services/accountFallback.ts";
|
|
import { PROVIDER_PROFILES } from "../../open-sse/config/constants.ts";
|
|
|
|
// Network-layer errors and OmniRoute's own queue timeouts must NOT trip the
|
|
// provider circuit breaker. These are not provider failures — the provider never
|
|
// saw the request, so it may be perfectly healthy while only the network path is
|
|
// broken (single-model path; the combo same-provider dead-proxy case is #8376's
|
|
// contract and stays untouched).
|
|
test("proxy_unreachable errorCode does NOT trip provider breaker", () => {
|
|
const result = shouldTripProviderBreakerForResult(
|
|
{ status: 502, errorCode: "proxy_unreachable", errorType: null, error: "ECONNREFUSED" },
|
|
false,
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result, false);
|
|
});
|
|
test("RATE_LIMIT_QUEUE_TIMEOUT errorCode does NOT trip provider breaker", () => {
|
|
const result = shouldTripProviderBreakerForResult(
|
|
{ status: 503, errorCode: "RATE_LIMIT_QUEUE_TIMEOUT", errorType: null, error: "queue expired" },
|
|
false,
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result, false);
|
|
});
|
|
test("RATE_LIMIT_QUEUE_WEDGED errorCode does NOT trip provider breaker", () => {
|
|
const result = shouldTripProviderBreakerForResult(
|
|
{ status: 503, errorCode: "RATE_LIMIT_QUEUE_WEDGED", errorType: null, error: "limiter wedged" },
|
|
false,
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result, false);
|
|
});
|
|
test("genuine 502 without proxy_unreachable DOES trip provider breaker", () => {
|
|
const result = shouldTripProviderBreakerForResult(
|
|
{ status: 502, errorCode: null, errorType: null, error: "upstream error" },
|
|
false,
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result, true);
|
|
});
|
|
test("genuine 503 without queue timeout DOES trip provider breaker", () => {
|
|
const result = shouldTripProviderBreakerForResult(
|
|
{ status: 503, errorCode: null, errorType: null, error: "service unavailable" },
|
|
false,
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result, true);
|
|
});
|
|
test("isCombo=true prevents breaker trip regardless of error", () => {
|
|
const result = shouldTripProviderBreakerForResult(
|
|
{ status: 502, errorCode: null, errorType: null, error: "upstream error" },
|
|
true,
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result, false);
|
|
});
|
|
test("forceLiveComboTest=true prevents breaker trip (combo will try next target)", () => {
|
|
const result = shouldTripProviderBreakerForResult(
|
|
{ status: 502, errorCode: null, errorType: null, error: "upstream error" },
|
|
false,
|
|
true
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// #12254: the single-model call site accounts for a RESOLVED dispatch result exactly
|
|
// once through this classifier — `breaker.execute()` no longer reads a resolved
|
|
// `{ success: false, status: 5xx }` as a success.
|
|
test("classifyProviderBreakerResult: a resolved 503 on the single-model path is a failure", () => {
|
|
const outcome = classifyProviderBreakerResult(
|
|
{ success: false, status: 503, errorCode: null, errorType: null, error: "service unavailable" },
|
|
false,
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(outcome, "failure");
|
|
});
|
|
test("classifyProviderBreakerResult: a successful single-model dispatch is a success", () => {
|
|
const outcome = classifyProviderBreakerResult({ success: true, status: 200 }, false, false);
|
|
assert.equal(outcome, "success");
|
|
});
|
|
test("classifyProviderBreakerResult: excluded failures are ignored, not counted as successes", () => {
|
|
const outcome = classifyProviderBreakerResult(
|
|
{ success: false, status: 502, errorCode: "proxy_unreachable", errorType: null },
|
|
false,
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(outcome, "ignore");
|
|
});
|
|
test("classifyProviderBreakerResult: combo dispatches leave accounting to combo.ts (success and failure)", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
classifyProviderBreakerResult({ success: true, status: 200 }, true, false),
|
|
"ignore"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
classifyProviderBreakerResult({ success: false, status: 503, errorCode: null }, true, false),
|
|
"ignore"
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
test("classifyProviderBreakerResult: live combo tests never touch the breaker", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
classifyProviderBreakerResult({ success: true, status: 200 }, false, true),
|
|
"ignore"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
classifyProviderBreakerResult({ success: false, status: 503, errorCode: null }, false, true),
|
|
"ignore"
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("queue-timeout recordProviderFailure never opens the provider breaker", () => {
|
|
// Control first: that many real failures WOULD open the breaker — proving the
|
|
// isQueueTimeout flag, not an inert provider, is what keeps it closed.
|
|
const control = "test-qt-control-provider";
|
|
clearProviderFailure(control);
|
|
const threshold = PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerThreshold;
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < threshold; i++) {
|
|
recordProviderFailure(control, undefined, undefined, null, {});
|
|
}
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(control), true, "sanity: real failures open the breaker");
|
|
|
|
// The queue-timeout path must never reach the breaker, no matter how many fire.
|
|
const provider = "test-qt-provider";
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < threshold; i++) {
|
|
recordProviderFailure(provider, undefined, undefined, null, { isQueueTimeout: true });
|
|
}
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(provider), false, "queue timeouts must not open the breaker");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("same-provider network errors in one window dedup to a single failure", () => {
|
|
// Several combo targets on the same provider failing one network event (a VPN blip)
|
|
// must count once, not per target — otherwise one blip opens the provider breaker.
|
|
const originalNow = Date.now;
|
|
let now = 1_700_000_000_000;
|
|
Date.now = () => now;
|
|
try {
|
|
const provider = "test-net-dedup-provider";
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
const threshold = PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerThreshold;
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < threshold; i++) {
|
|
recordProviderFailure(provider, undefined, undefined, null, { isNetworkError: true });
|
|
now += 500; // every call inside the same 10s window
|
|
}
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
isProviderInCooldown(provider),
|
|
false,
|
|
"one transient network event must not open the breaker"
|
|
);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
Date.now = originalNow;
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("persistent dead proxy across windows still opens the breaker", () => {
|
|
// A genuinely dead proxy keeps failing across requests (past the dedup window), so it
|
|
// must still accumulate to the breaker threshold — the dedup must not shield real pain.
|
|
const originalNow = Date.now;
|
|
let now = 1_700_000_000_000;
|
|
Date.now = () => now;
|
|
try {
|
|
const provider = "test-net-deadproxy-provider";
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
const threshold = PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerThreshold;
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < threshold; i++) {
|
|
recordProviderFailure(provider, undefined, undefined, null, { isNetworkError: true });
|
|
now += 11_000; // past each 10s window
|
|
}
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
isProviderInCooldown(provider),
|
|
true,
|
|
"a persistent network failure must still accumulate to the threshold"
|
|
);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
Date.now = originalNow;
|
|
}
|
|
});
|