mirror of
https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute.git
synced 2026-09-13 18:32:12 +03:00
65e81158ab
Landed with the design call resolved per the owner's pick — **option 1**: the synced store is now endpoint-agnostic (persistDiscoveredModels and managedModelImport no longer drop non-chat models at write time), and chat selectability moved to read time (auto-pool expansion in autoStrategy applies filterChatSelectableModels; the models-route projection already had its chatOnly filter). Your discovery test now passes end-to-end (3/3): /api/show capabilities persist per connection and image/embedding requests route through the advertising host. Reconciliation notes: conflicted areas merged onto the current tip (adobe discovery import, requestedModel preflight signature, resolvedProvider fast-path coexists with the synced-route override — explicit resolution wins); carried base-red drains (#10055 memoization, #11071 test variants) dropped as already-landed; the managed-model-import exclusion test was propagated to the new contract (image/video models persist; the read filter still hides them from chat pickers — pinned by a new assertion). Full battery: 205/206 focused (the one red is a confirmed periodic-timer timing flake on the loaded devbox — 20/20 isolated), autoCombo vitest 30/30, combo suites 46/46, gates + typecheck clean. Thank you @yourspraveen — the capability probe + routing design was right; it just needed the store contract opened up. Fixes #11087.
43 lines
1.7 KiB
TypeScript
43 lines
1.7 KiB
TypeScript
import { test } from "node:test";
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import { updateProviderConnectionSchema } from "@/shared/validation/schemas/provider";
|
|
|
|
test("PATCH rateLimitOverrides {rpm:\"60\"} coerces to a valid number", () => {
|
|
const r = updateProviderConnectionSchema.safeParse({ rateLimitOverrides: { rpm: "60" } });
|
|
assert.equal(r.success, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("unknown key in rateLimitOverrides is rejected (no silent drop)", () => {
|
|
const r = updateProviderConnectionSchema.safeParse({ rateLimitOverrides: { rpm: 10, foo: 1 } });
|
|
assert.equal(r.success, false);
|
|
const flaggedFoo = r.error!.issues.some(
|
|
(i) => i.path.includes("foo") || (i as { keys?: string[] }).keys?.includes("foo") || i.message.includes("foo")
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
flaggedFoo,
|
|
`expected an issue flagging "foo", got: ${JSON.stringify(r.error!.issues)}`
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("quotaWindowThresholds key longer than 64 chars is rejected", () => {
|
|
const r = updateProviderConnectionSchema.safeParse({
|
|
quotaWindowThresholds: { ["a".repeat(65)]: 50 },
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(r.success, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("empty string rate limit value is rejected (coerce \"\"→0 trap)", () => {
|
|
const r = updateProviderConnectionSchema.safeParse({ rateLimitOverrides: { rpm: "" } });
|
|
assert.equal(r.success, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("non-numeric rate limit value is rejected", () => {
|
|
const r = updateProviderConnectionSchema.safeParse({ rateLimitOverrides: { rpm: "60abc" } });
|
|
assert.equal(r.success, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("quotaWindowThresholds value outside 0-100 is rejected", () => {
|
|
const r = updateProviderConnectionSchema.safeParse({ quotaWindowThresholds: { win: 101 } });
|
|
assert.equal(r.success, false);
|
|
});
|