Files
OmniRoute/tests
MumuTW 1cfbfc044a fix(sse): estimate tokens from the object and count JSON length without building it (#7847) (#8558)
Two changes with one root cause: several hot paths built a full JSON string only to read
its .length, and one of them silently changed the answer.

1. CORRECTNESS -- combo's fallback-compression trigger

   estimateTokens(JSON.stringify(attemptBody)) took the STRING branch of estimateTokens,
   which is ceil(length / CHARS_PER_TOKEN) over the raw JSON. An inline base64 image is
   then charged as if every character of the data URL were prose. Measured on a 200 KB
   inline image:

     via string (before)  50,039 tokens
     via object (after)    1,231 tokens

   a 40x over-count, tripping fallback compression on requests nowhere near the context
   window. This is the same class #8368/#8401 fixed on the request path; the combo call
   site was missed. Passing the object routes through extractImageTokens, which charges
   images structurally. Text-only bodies are unaffected -- verified identical, and pinned
   by a test.

2. ALLOCATION -- jsonLength()

   Adds an exact serialized-length walker: same O(n) scan, no string. Used by
   estimateTokens' object branch and by streamReadinessPolicy (which runs on every
   streaming request and only ever used .length).

   Exactness matters because every consumer feeds a threshold, so this is property-tested
   against JSON.stringify over 4000 generated structures covering escaping, lone
   surrogates, omitted values, non-finite numbers, toJSON, Date, Map, cycles and BigInt.
   Anything outside the plain-JSON subset falls back to JSON.stringify for THAT SUBTREE
   only, so an exotic leaf never forces the message history back onto the allocating path.

Honest scoping of the memory win: the string was always transient, and V8 collects it
efficiently, so this is not 3 MiB of retained heap. Measured allocation churn over 20 calls
on a 3.06 MiB body: 3.1 MiB -> 0.5 MiB, about 6x less. The #8549 benchmark row for this
mechanism measures a HELD string and therefore overstates it; the correctness fix above is
the larger deliverable here.
2026-07-26 03:52:38 -03:00
..
2026-07-13 09:12:40 -03:00
2026-07-06 02:25:17 -03:00
2026-07-13 09:12:40 -03:00
2026-06-13 17:27:40 -03:00