Files
OmniRoute/tests
Dizzle 2f33f2c20d feat(routing): report why the zero-cost guard excluded a candidate (#12319)
With freeAccessPolicy: "strict" the read-only candidate listing silently dropped rows, so an operator could not tell "no free allowance left" from "the quota fetcher is broken" — in a listing whose own module header promises a candidate the routing path would skip "is never dropped". #9133 settled the same question for the resilience filter via a skip opt-out; the zero-cost guard never got one.

It gets it now: the guard is disabled for the inspector build exactly as the resilience filter already is, and every candidate carries freeAccessExclusion — null when satisfied, otherwise one of seven named reasons. The last three (exhausted, state-unknown, no-connection) are the point: they used to look identical because the row just disappeared. STRICT_ZERO_COST.md documents what each asks the operator to do.

Dispatch is untouched and a test pins that. The three existing guard suites were not modified — their 31 cases are the net and still pass. excludeTosAvoid still drops candidates without a reason; documented as a separate question rather than widened into here.

Verified in a combined batch worktree: 174/174 focused tests across all 11 PRs of this batch, typecheck:core clean, complexity 2706/3218, cognitive-complexity 1221/1437, check:cycles and check:docs-counts green.

Thanks @maxmad64bis — the reason table and the honest note about the order change (freshness before status) made this easy to review.
2026-09-01 11:49:56 -03:00
..
2026-08-26 14:25:01 -03:00