mirror of
https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute.git
synced 2026-09-10 00:42:21 +03:00
3b82d85081
docs/routing/AUTO-COMBO.md documented four mode packs; six ship. It printed 0.14 where modePacks.ts says 0.1333. And nothing was watching: four documents stated a scoring-factor count and check:docs-counts covered none of them. Wiring them up turned the gate red on seven real drifts — ARCHITECTURE.md and REPOSITORY_MAP.md at "9-factor" (code: 15) and "4 mode packs" (code: 6), RESILIENCE_GUIDE.md and SKILL.md at 13, AUTO-COMBO-GUIDE.md at both 5 and 13. ARCHITECTURE.md did not merely have the wrong number: it named nine factors that are not the engine's, and its four "mode packs" were the auto/* request prefixes. A product fact fell out of writing the table: no pack sets quality, and applying a pack replaces the weight map wholesale (weights = pack in engine.ts, not a merge), so quality carries 0.03 by default and normalizes to 0 under any pack — pick a mode pack and the observed-quality signal stops voting. Documented, not changed. The gate reads pack names from the module through the tsx subprocess that already reads every other code-derived count, matching the three spellings the docs actually use; on the reference document a missing claim now fails rather than passing. The dashboard was behind too (four of six packs offered); the count is dropped from the strategy label rather than corrected, since nothing reads selector labels and a right-today number goes stale unnoticed. Verified in a combined batch worktree: 174/174 focused tests across all 11 PRs of this batch, typecheck:core clean, and check:docs-counts green with the four newly-wired documents. Thanks @maxmad64bis — finding the quality-under-a-pack behaviour while writing a docs table is the kind of thing a table is for.