Files
OmniRoute/tests/unit/chat-early-schema-validation-6412.test.ts
Praveen K Palaniswamy 65e81158ab fix(ollama): route models by advertised capability (#11088)
Landed with the design call resolved per the owner's pick — **option 1**: the synced store is now endpoint-agnostic (persistDiscoveredModels and managedModelImport no longer drop non-chat models at write time), and chat selectability moved to read time (auto-pool expansion in autoStrategy applies filterChatSelectableModels; the models-route projection already had its chatOnly filter). Your discovery test now passes end-to-end (3/3): /api/show capabilities persist per connection and image/embedding requests route through the advertising host.

Reconciliation notes: conflicted areas merged onto the current tip (adobe discovery import, requestedModel preflight signature, resolvedProvider fast-path coexists with the synced-route override — explicit resolution wins); carried base-red drains (#10055 memoization, #11071 test variants) dropped as already-landed; the managed-model-import exclusion test was propagated to the new contract (image/video models persist; the read filter still hides them from chat pickers — pinned by a new assertion). Full battery: 205/206 focused (the one red is a confirmed periodic-timer timing flake on the loaded devbox — 20/20 isolated), autoCombo vitest 30/30, combo suites 46/46, gates + typecheck clean.

Thank you @yourspraveen — the capability probe + routing design was right; it just needed the store contract opened up. Fixes #11087.
2026-08-23 11:45:01 -03:00

124 lines
4.0 KiB
TypeScript

import test from "node:test";
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
import { createChatPipelineHarness } from "../integration/_chatPipelineHarness.ts";
const harness = await createChatPipelineHarness("chat-early-schema-6412");
const { buildRequest, handleChat, resetStorage } = harness;
test.beforeEach(async () => {
await resetStorage();
});
test.after(async () => {
await harness.cleanup();
});
/**
* Regression guard for #6412 — schema validation of scalar params (temperature,
* top_p, max_tokens, n) MUST run BEFORE provider/model resolution. Previously,
* a bad `temperature: "not-a-number"` combined with an unknown provider
* returned 404 "model_not_found" — hiding the real schema error.
*/
interface ChatTestRequestBody {
model: string;
messages: Array<{ role: string; content: string }>;
// Intentionally loose: these are the scalar params under test, and several
// cases below deliberately pass the WRONG runtime type (e.g. temperature as
// a string) to prove schema validation catches it before provider lookup.
temperature?: unknown;
top_p?: unknown;
max_tokens?: unknown;
n?: unknown;
}
interface ChatTestResponsePayload {
error?: unknown;
}
async function postChat(body: ChatTestRequestBody) {
const response = await handleChat(buildRequest({ body }));
const payload = (await response.json()) as ChatTestResponsePayload;
return { status: response.status, payload };
}
test("bad temperature (string) on unknown provider → 400, not 404", async () => {
const { status, payload } = await postChat({
model: "nonexistent-provider/nonexistent-model",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hi" }],
temperature: "not-a-number",
});
assert.equal(status, 400);
assert.match(JSON.stringify(payload.error), /temperature/i);
});
test("out-of-range temperature (5.0) on unknown provider → 400, not 404", async () => {
const { status, payload } = await postChat({
model: "nonexistent-provider/nonexistent-model",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hi" }],
temperature: 5.0,
});
assert.equal(status, 400);
assert.match(JSON.stringify(payload.error), /temperature/i);
});
test("bad top_p (string) → 400", async () => {
const { status, payload } = await postChat({
model: "nonexistent-provider/nonexistent-model",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hi" }],
top_p: "bad",
});
assert.equal(status, 400);
assert.match(JSON.stringify(payload.error), /top_p/i);
});
test("bad max_tokens (negative) → 400", async () => {
const { status, payload } = await postChat({
model: "nonexistent-provider/nonexistent-model",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hi" }],
max_tokens: -1,
});
assert.equal(status, 400);
assert.match(JSON.stringify(payload.error), /max_tokens/i);
});
test("bad n (0) → 400", async () => {
const { status, payload } = await postChat({
model: "nonexistent-provider/nonexistent-model",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hi" }],
n: 0,
});
assert.equal(status, 400);
assert.match(JSON.stringify(payload.error), /n:/);
});
test("valid params (temperature=0.7) on unknown provider still 404 (provider lookup runs after schema ok)", async () => {
const { status, payload } = await postChat({
model: "nonexistent-provider/nonexistent-model",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hi" }],
temperature: 0.7,
max_tokens: 100,
});
assert.ok(
status === 404 || status === 401,
`schema-ok unknown provider should 404 or 401, got ${status}`
);
assert.match(
JSON.stringify(payload.error),
/model_not_found|No active credentials|unauthorized|authentication/i
);
});
test("params omitted entirely → schema passes, no false 400", async () => {
const { status } = await postChat({
model: "nonexistent-provider/nonexistent-model",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hi" }],
});
// Auth may run before catalog lookup (401) or catalog may 404 the unknown model.
assert.ok(
status === 404 || status === 401,
`expected routing 404/401 after schema pass-through, got ${status}`
);
});