Files
OmniRoute/tests/unit/build
Diego Rodrigues de Sa e Souza 7bb3bc7e32 fix(ci): pin Build (advisory) to a hosted runner with memory provisioning (#10408)
* fix(ci): pin Build (advisory) to a hosted runner with memory provisioning

`Build (advisory)` has been reporting a permanent red on every PR while
producing no usable signal at all.

Measured over the last 25 quality.yml runs (2026-08-14): not one instance of
the job reached a conclusion. Every sample was either queued on the
self-hosted pool — 2 runners, omniroute-113-6/7, both permanently busy; one
job sat queued for over 2 hours and was still unclaimed — or, when it did land
on a runner, killed mid-build by this workflow's own cancel-in-progress
concurrency. All 6 sampled "failures" are exit 143 / "The runner has received
a shutdown signal" at ~3.5 min into `npm run build`. Zero OOM, zero build
errors. The job was consuming a runner the real gates compete for while
telling every PR author it was broken.

Gap 19 deliberately left USE_VPS_RUNNER governing build-like jobs, on the
premise that the build needs the .113's RAM. That premise no longer holds:
`Fast Production Build` (build.yml) runs `build:release` — a superset of this
job's `npm run build`, plus the CLI bundle — on plain ubuntu-latest and passed
24 of its last 25 runs in ~15 min. The difference is memory PROVISIONING, not
the machine: a 10 GB swapfile plus a 12 GB V8 heap. Swap is the part that
matters, because --max-old-space-size bounds only V8's JS heap and never
Turbopack's native Rust allocation (#6409).

Pins the job to ubuntu-latest and mirrors both settings from build.yml.
USE_VPS_RUNNER keeps its other consumers (ci.yml Build, nightly-release-green,
npm-publish), so the variable stays meaningful. Fork safety is strictly
improved: no PR can reach the LAN runner through this job any more.

check:workflows --ratchet: 186 zizmor findings, baseline 190, no regression.
prettier + YAML parse: clean.

* fix(ci): scope Build (advisory) to fork PRs

Follow-up to the hosted-runner pin in this same PR, after measuring what the
job is actually for.

build.yml's `Fast Production Build` triggers on `push: branches: ["**"]` and
runs `build:release` — a superset of this job's `npm run build`, plus the CLI
bundle. For an own-origin branch that push fires here, so the tree was being
built twice per PR. A fork contributor pushes to THEIR repo, so build.yml
never runs in this repo and this job is their only pre-merge build signal.

That could have argued for deleting the job, except the traffic says
otherwise: 72 of the last 100 PRs into release/** come from forks. The fork
case is the majority, not the exception. So the job earns its place — it just
should not duplicate build.yml for the own-origin 28%. Added the fork filter
to the existing `if`.

Also corrects the reliability claim in the previous commit message. Over a
wider window the job is not literally never-green: across 2026-08-13/14 it
reached `success` on roughly 10-15% of runs (13/138 on 08-14, 7/53 sampled on
08-13). Chronically unreliable, not permanently dead — the conclusion and the
fix are unchanged.

The #7307 guard in tests/unit/build/check-workflows.test.ts pinned the old
self-hosted expression, so it is realigned here: it now asserts the hosted
pin, the absence of self-hosted/USE_VPS_RUNNER in the job's DIRECTIVES (the
comment legitimately explains why the pool was abandoned, so the scan strips
comments), both memory settings, and the fork filter. Mutation-validated —
restoring self-hosted, dropping the swapfile, or flipping the fork filter each
turns it red.

check-workflows.test.ts: 32 pass, 0 fail.
check:workflows --ratchet: 186 findings, baseline 190, no regression.

---------

Co-authored-by: Xiangzhe <bakryun0718@proton.me>
2026-08-14 17:27:45 -03:00
..