mirror of
https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute.git
synced 2026-08-05 14:52:09 +03:00
* chore: add GPT-5.5 Instant and support Node 26 (#1977) chore: add GPT-5.5 Instant model to Codex registry + Node 26 support with CI + improved native SQLite error handling. Integrated into release/v3.7.9 * feat: enhance cost formatting and add Codex GPT-5.5 pricing support * fix formatting --------- Co-authored-by: backryun <bakryun0718@proton.me> Co-authored-by: Jan Leon <jan.gaschler@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: 05dunski <05dunski-kredo@icloud.com>
762 lines
26 KiB
TypeScript
762 lines
26 KiB
TypeScript
import test from "node:test";
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
|
|
const accountFallback = await import("../../open-sse/services/accountFallback.ts");
|
|
const accountSelector = await import("../../open-sse/services/accountSelector.ts");
|
|
const { RateLimitReason, COOLDOWN_MS, PROVIDER_PROFILES } =
|
|
await import("../../open-sse/config/constants.ts");
|
|
const { getCircuitBreaker } = await import("../../src/shared/utils/circuitBreaker.ts");
|
|
|
|
const {
|
|
isOAuthInvalidToken,
|
|
parseRetryFromErrorText,
|
|
checkFallbackError,
|
|
filterAvailableAccounts,
|
|
getEarliestRateLimitedUntil,
|
|
formatRetryAfter,
|
|
applyErrorState,
|
|
lockModelIfPerModelQuota,
|
|
isModelLocked,
|
|
getModelLockoutInfo,
|
|
hasPerModelQuota,
|
|
getProviderProfile,
|
|
recordModelLockoutFailure,
|
|
clearModelLock,
|
|
shouldMarkAccountExhaustedFrom429,
|
|
recordProviderFailure,
|
|
isProviderInCooldown,
|
|
getProviderCooldownRemainingMs,
|
|
clearProviderFailure,
|
|
isProviderFailureCode,
|
|
getProvidersInCooldown,
|
|
} = accountFallback;
|
|
|
|
const { selectAccount } = accountSelector;
|
|
|
|
function withMockedNow(now, fn) {
|
|
const originalNow = Date.now;
|
|
Date.now = () => now;
|
|
try {
|
|
return fn();
|
|
} finally {
|
|
Date.now = originalNow;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test("isOAuthInvalidToken detects refreshable oauth failures", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
isOAuthInvalidToken("Invalid authentication credentials for this OAuth 2 session"),
|
|
true
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(isOAuthInvalidToken("plain rate limit"), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("parseRetryFromErrorText parses both compact reset formats", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(parseRetryFromErrorText("Your quota will reset after 2h30m14s"), 9_014_000);
|
|
assert.equal(parseRetryFromErrorText("The pool will reset after 45m"), 2_700_000);
|
|
assert.equal(parseRetryFromErrorText("This will reset after 30s"), 30_000);
|
|
assert.equal(parseRetryFromErrorText("No reset metadata"), null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError marks deactivated accounts as permanent auth failures", () => {
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(401, "This account has been deactivated");
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.reason, RateLimitReason.AUTH_ERROR);
|
|
assert.equal(result.permanent, true);
|
|
assert.ok(result.cooldownMs >= 300 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError treats non-429 exhausted credits as long quota cooldowns", () => {
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(402, "credit_balance_too_low");
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.reason, RateLimitReason.QUOTA_EXHAUSTED);
|
|
assert.equal(result.creditsExhausted, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.cooldownMs, COOLDOWN_MS.paymentRequired ?? 3600 * 1000);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError keeps API-key 429 exhausted-credit text on the resilience cooldown path", () => {
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(429, "credit_balance_too_low", 0, null, "openai", null, {
|
|
baseCooldownMs: 125,
|
|
useUpstreamRetryHints: false,
|
|
maxBackoffSteps: 3,
|
|
failureThreshold: 60,
|
|
resetTimeoutMs: 5000,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.reason, RateLimitReason.RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED);
|
|
assert.equal(result.creditsExhausted, undefined);
|
|
assert.equal(result.cooldownMs, 125);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError preserves OAuth 429 exhausted-credit semantics", () => {
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(429, "credit_balance_too_low", 0, null, "codex", null, {
|
|
baseCooldownMs: 125,
|
|
useUpstreamRetryHints: false,
|
|
maxBackoffSteps: 3,
|
|
failureThreshold: 60,
|
|
resetTimeoutMs: 5000,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.reason, RateLimitReason.QUOTA_EXHAUSTED);
|
|
assert.equal(result.creditsExhausted, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.cooldownMs, COOLDOWN_MS.paymentRequired ?? 3600 * 1000);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError keeps API-key 429 quota text on the status-based resilience path", () => {
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(429, "quota exceeded", 0, null, "openai", null, {
|
|
baseCooldownMs: 125,
|
|
useUpstreamRetryHints: false,
|
|
maxBackoffSteps: 3,
|
|
failureThreshold: 60,
|
|
resetTimeoutMs: 5000,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.reason, RateLimitReason.RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED);
|
|
assert.equal(result.cooldownMs, 125);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError honors Retry-After header for rate limits", () => {
|
|
withMockedNow(1_700_000_000_000, () => {
|
|
const headers = new Headers({ "retry-after": "120" });
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(429, "Rate limit hit", 3, null, "openai", headers);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.reason, RateLimitReason.RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED);
|
|
assert.equal(result.newBackoffLevel, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(result.cooldownMs, 120_000);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError honors x-ratelimit-reset for transient 5xx errors", () => {
|
|
withMockedNow(1_700_000_000_000, () => {
|
|
const resetSeconds = Math.floor((Date.now() + 90_000) / 1000);
|
|
const headers = new Headers({ "x-ratelimit-reset": String(resetSeconds) });
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(503, "upstream unavailable", 1, null, "openai", headers);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.reason, RateLimitReason.SERVER_ERROR);
|
|
assert.equal(result.newBackoffLevel, 0);
|
|
assert.ok(result.cooldownMs >= 89_000);
|
|
assert.ok(result.cooldownMs <= 90_000);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError keeps generic 400 client errors terminal", () => {
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(400, "bad request payload");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, {
|
|
shouldFallback: false,
|
|
cooldownMs: 0,
|
|
reason: RateLimitReason.UNKNOWN,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("filterAvailableAccounts skips exclusion and active cooldowns but keeps recovered ones", () => {
|
|
withMockedNow(1_700_000_000_000, () => {
|
|
const accounts = [
|
|
{ id: "exclude-me" },
|
|
{ id: "cooling", rateLimitedUntil: new Date(Date.now() + 60_000).toISOString() },
|
|
{ id: "recovered", rateLimitedUntil: new Date(Date.now() - 1_000).toISOString() },
|
|
{ id: "healthy" },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
const available = filterAvailableAccounts(accounts, "exclude-me");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
available.map((account) => account.id),
|
|
["recovered", "healthy"]
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("getEarliestRateLimitedUntil returns the shortest future cooldown and formatRetryAfter humanizes it", () => {
|
|
withMockedNow(1_700_000_000_000, () => {
|
|
const earliest = getEarliestRateLimitedUntil([
|
|
{ id: "expired", rateLimitedUntil: new Date(Date.now() - 5_000).toISOString() },
|
|
{ id: "later", rateLimitedUntil: new Date(Date.now() + 90_000).toISOString() },
|
|
{ id: "earliest", rateLimitedUntil: new Date(Date.now() + 30_000).toISOString() },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(earliest, new Date(Date.now() + 30_000).toISOString());
|
|
assert.equal(formatRetryAfter(earliest), "reset after 30s");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("applyErrorState and selectAccount advance to the next account after an auth failure", () => {
|
|
withMockedNow(1_700_000_000_000, () => {
|
|
const accounts = [
|
|
{ id: "conn-a", backoffLevel: 0 },
|
|
{ id: "conn-b", backoffLevel: 0 },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
const firstSelection = selectAccount(accounts, "fill-first");
|
|
assert.equal(firstSelection.account.id, "conn-a");
|
|
|
|
const failedFirst = applyErrorState(firstSelection.account, 401, "Unauthorized", "claude");
|
|
assert.equal(failedFirst.status, "error");
|
|
assert.equal(failedFirst.lastError.reason, RateLimitReason.AUTH_ERROR);
|
|
|
|
const candidates = filterAvailableAccounts([failedFirst, accounts[1]], failedFirst.id);
|
|
const nextSelection = selectAccount(candidates, "fill-first");
|
|
assert.equal(nextSelection.account.id, "conn-b");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("lockModelIfPerModelQuota only locks supported providers and real models", () => {
|
|
const geminiConnectionId = `gemini-${Date.now()}`;
|
|
const openAiConnectionId = `openai-${Date.now()}`;
|
|
const compatibleConnectionId = `compatible-${Date.now()}`;
|
|
const compatibleProvider = "openai-compatible-custom-node";
|
|
const compatibleModel = "custom-model-a";
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(hasPerModelQuota("gemini"), true);
|
|
assert.equal(hasPerModelQuota("openai"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(hasPerModelQuota(compatibleProvider, compatibleModel), true);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
lockModelIfPerModelQuota(
|
|
"gemini",
|
|
geminiConnectionId,
|
|
"gemini-2.5-pro",
|
|
RateLimitReason.RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED,
|
|
30_000
|
|
),
|
|
true
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(isModelLocked("gemini", geminiConnectionId, "gemini-2.5-pro"), true);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
lockModelIfPerModelQuota(
|
|
"openai",
|
|
openAiConnectionId,
|
|
"gpt-5-mini",
|
|
RateLimitReason.RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED,
|
|
30_000
|
|
),
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(isModelLocked("openai", openAiConnectionId, "gpt-5-mini"), false);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
lockModelIfPerModelQuota(
|
|
compatibleProvider,
|
|
compatibleConnectionId,
|
|
compatibleModel,
|
|
RateLimitReason.RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED,
|
|
30_000
|
|
),
|
|
true
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(isModelLocked(compatibleProvider, compatibleConnectionId, compatibleModel), true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("getProviderProfile differentiates oauth and api-key providers", () => {
|
|
const oauthProfile = getProviderProfile("claude");
|
|
assert.equal(oauthProfile.transientCooldown, PROVIDER_PROFILES.oauth.transientCooldown);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
oauthProfile.rateLimitCooldown,
|
|
oauthProfile.useUpstreamRetryHints ? 0 : oauthProfile.baseCooldownMs
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(oauthProfile.maxBackoffLevel, PROVIDER_PROFILES.oauth.maxBackoffLevel);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
oauthProfile.circuitBreakerThreshold,
|
|
PROVIDER_PROFILES.oauth.circuitBreakerThreshold
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(oauthProfile.circuitBreakerReset, PROVIDER_PROFILES.oauth.circuitBreakerReset);
|
|
assert.equal(oauthProfile.baseCooldownMs, PROVIDER_PROFILES.oauth.transientCooldown);
|
|
assert.equal(oauthProfile.failureThreshold, PROVIDER_PROFILES.oauth.circuitBreakerThreshold);
|
|
assert.equal(oauthProfile.resetTimeoutMs, PROVIDER_PROFILES.oauth.circuitBreakerReset);
|
|
|
|
const apiKeyProfile = getProviderProfile("openai");
|
|
assert.equal(apiKeyProfile.transientCooldown, PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.transientCooldown);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
apiKeyProfile.rateLimitCooldown,
|
|
apiKeyProfile.useUpstreamRetryHints ? 0 : apiKeyProfile.baseCooldownMs
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(apiKeyProfile.maxBackoffLevel, PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.maxBackoffLevel);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
apiKeyProfile.circuitBreakerThreshold,
|
|
PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerThreshold
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(apiKeyProfile.circuitBreakerReset, PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerReset);
|
|
assert.equal(apiKeyProfile.baseCooldownMs, PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.transientCooldown);
|
|
assert.equal(apiKeyProfile.failureThreshold, PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerThreshold);
|
|
assert.equal(apiKeyProfile.resetTimeoutMs, PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerReset);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("shouldMarkAccountExhaustedFrom429 skips connection poisoning for compatible providers", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(shouldMarkAccountExhaustedFrom429("gemini", "gemini-2.5-pro"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
shouldMarkAccountExhaustedFrom429("openai-compatible-custom-node", "any-model"),
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(shouldMarkAccountExhaustedFrom429("openai", "gpt-4o-mini"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(shouldMarkAccountExhaustedFrom429("claude", "claude-sonnet-4-6"), true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("hasPerModelQuota returns true for GitHub Copilot provider (#1624)", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(hasPerModelQuota("github"), true);
|
|
assert.equal(hasPerModelQuota("github", "gpt-5.1-codex-max"), true);
|
|
assert.equal(hasPerModelQuota("github", "gpt-5-mini"), true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("shouldMarkAccountExhaustedFrom429 skips connection-wide lockout for GitHub (#1624)", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(shouldMarkAccountExhaustedFrom429("github", "gpt-5.1-codex-max"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(shouldMarkAccountExhaustedFrom429("github", "gpt-5-mini"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(shouldMarkAccountExhaustedFrom429("github", "claude-haiku-4.5"), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("lockModelIfPerModelQuota locks individual GitHub models without poisoning the connection (#1624)", () => {
|
|
const connectionId = `github-${Date.now()}`;
|
|
|
|
// A 429 on a high-PRU model should lock ONLY that model
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
lockModelIfPerModelQuota(
|
|
"github",
|
|
connectionId,
|
|
"gpt-5.1-codex-max",
|
|
RateLimitReason.RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED,
|
|
30_000
|
|
),
|
|
true
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(isModelLocked("github", connectionId, "gpt-5.1-codex-max"), true);
|
|
|
|
// Other models on the same connection should remain unlocked
|
|
assert.equal(isModelLocked("github", connectionId, "gpt-5-mini"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(isModelLocked("github", connectionId, "claude-haiku-4.5"), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("recordModelLockoutFailure uses provider profile cooldowns, backoff, and reset window", () => {
|
|
const originalNow = Date.now;
|
|
let now = 1_700_000_000_000;
|
|
Date.now = () => now;
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
const compatibleProvider = "openai-compatible-custom-node";
|
|
const compatibleModel = "custom-model-a";
|
|
const profile = {
|
|
baseCooldownMs: 125,
|
|
useUpstreamRetryHints: false,
|
|
maxBackoffSteps: 2,
|
|
failureThreshold: 60,
|
|
resetTimeoutMs: 500,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const first = recordModelLockoutFailure(
|
|
compatibleProvider,
|
|
"conn-compatible",
|
|
compatibleModel,
|
|
"rate_limited",
|
|
429,
|
|
0,
|
|
profile
|
|
);
|
|
now += 50;
|
|
const second = recordModelLockoutFailure(
|
|
compatibleProvider,
|
|
"conn-compatible",
|
|
compatibleModel,
|
|
"rate_limited",
|
|
429,
|
|
0,
|
|
profile
|
|
);
|
|
now += 50;
|
|
const third = recordModelLockoutFailure(
|
|
compatibleProvider,
|
|
"conn-compatible",
|
|
compatibleModel,
|
|
"rate_limited",
|
|
429,
|
|
0,
|
|
profile
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const info = getModelLockoutInfo(compatibleProvider, "conn-compatible", compatibleModel);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(first.failureCount, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(first.cooldownMs, 125);
|
|
assert.equal(second.failureCount, 2);
|
|
assert.equal(second.cooldownMs, 250);
|
|
assert.equal(third.failureCount, 3);
|
|
assert.equal(third.cooldownMs, 500);
|
|
assert.equal(info.failureCount, 3);
|
|
|
|
clearModelLock(compatibleProvider, "conn-compatible", compatibleModel);
|
|
now += 600;
|
|
|
|
const afterReset = recordModelLockoutFailure(
|
|
compatibleProvider,
|
|
"conn-compatible",
|
|
compatibleModel,
|
|
"rate_limited",
|
|
429,
|
|
0,
|
|
profile
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(afterReset.failureCount, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(afterReset.cooldownMs, 125);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
Date.now = originalNow;
|
|
clearModelLock("openai-compatible-custom-node", "conn-compatible", "custom-model-a");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Provider-level failure circuit breaker tests
|
|
test("isProviderFailureCode correctly identifies provider-wide transient error codes", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(429), false);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(408), true);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(500), true);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(502), true);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(503), true);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(504), true);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(401), false);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(403), false);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(400), false);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(404), false);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderFailureCode(200), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("recordProviderFailure tracks failures and triggers cooldown after threshold", () => {
|
|
const originalNow = Date.now;
|
|
let now = 1_700_000_000_000;
|
|
Date.now = () => now;
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
const provider = "test-provider";
|
|
|
|
// Clear any existing state
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(provider), false);
|
|
assert.equal(getProviderCooldownRemainingMs(provider), null);
|
|
|
|
const threshold = PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerThreshold;
|
|
|
|
// Record failures up to threshold - 1
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < threshold - 1; i++) {
|
|
recordProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
now += 1000; // 1 second between failures
|
|
}
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(provider), false);
|
|
|
|
// Final failure to trigger threshold
|
|
recordProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(provider), true);
|
|
|
|
const remaining = getProviderCooldownRemainingMs(provider);
|
|
assert.ok(remaining !== null);
|
|
assert.ok(remaining > 0);
|
|
assert.ok(remaining <= 10 * 60 * 1000); // 10 minutes max
|
|
|
|
// Check getProvidersInCooldown returns the provider
|
|
const inCooldown = getProvidersInCooldown();
|
|
assert.ok(inCooldown.some((p) => p.provider === provider));
|
|
assert.equal(inCooldown.find((p) => p.provider === provider)?.failureCount, threshold);
|
|
|
|
// Simulate cooldown expiration
|
|
now += 11 * 60 * 1000; // 11 minutes later
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(provider), false);
|
|
assert.equal(getProviderCooldownRemainingMs(provider), null);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
getProvidersInCooldown().some((p) => p.provider === provider),
|
|
false
|
|
);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
Date.now = originalNow;
|
|
clearProviderFailure("test-provider");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("recordProviderFailure honors runtime provider breaker profile", () => {
|
|
const provider = "test-provider-runtime-profile";
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
const runtimeProfile = {
|
|
failureThreshold: PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerThreshold + 7,
|
|
resetTimeoutMs: PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerReset + 45_000,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
recordProviderFailure(provider, undefined, "conn-runtime-profile", runtimeProfile);
|
|
|
|
const breaker = getCircuitBreaker(provider);
|
|
assert.equal(breaker.failureThreshold, runtimeProfile.failureThreshold);
|
|
assert.equal(breaker.resetTimeout, runtimeProfile.resetTimeoutMs);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(provider), false);
|
|
|
|
const breakerAfterStatusCheck = getCircuitBreaker(provider);
|
|
assert.equal(breakerAfterStatusCheck.failureThreshold, runtimeProfile.failureThreshold);
|
|
assert.equal(breakerAfterStatusCheck.resetTimeout, runtimeProfile.resetTimeoutMs);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError no longer mutates provider breaker state on per-connection failures", () => {
|
|
const provider = "test-provider-check";
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
|
checkFallbackError(429, "rate limited", 0, null, provider);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(provider), false);
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError does not record provider failure for non-transient errors", () => {
|
|
const originalNow = Date.now;
|
|
let now = 1_700_000_000_000;
|
|
Date.now = () => now;
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
const provider = "test-provider-no-record";
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
|
|
// Simulate 5 auth errors (401) - should NOT trigger provider cooldown
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
|
checkFallbackError(401, "unauthorized", 0, null, provider);
|
|
now += 1000;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Provider should NOT be in cooldown
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(provider), false);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
Date.now = originalNow;
|
|
clearProviderFailure("test-provider-no-record");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("clearProviderFailure removes provider from cooldown", () => {
|
|
const originalNow = Date.now;
|
|
let now = 1_700_000_000_000;
|
|
Date.now = () => now;
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
const provider = "test-provider-clear";
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
|
|
// Trigger cooldown
|
|
const threshold = PROVIDER_PROFILES.apikey.circuitBreakerThreshold;
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < threshold; i++) {
|
|
recordProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
now += 1000;
|
|
}
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(provider), true);
|
|
|
|
// Clear the failure state
|
|
clearProviderFailure(provider);
|
|
assert.equal(isProviderInCooldown(provider), false);
|
|
assert.equal(getProviderCooldownRemainingMs(provider), null);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
Date.now = originalNow;
|
|
clearProviderFailure("test-provider-clear");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Daily quota exhausted detection tests
|
|
test("isDailyQuotaExhausted detects today's quota errors", () => {
|
|
const { isDailyQuotaExhausted } = accountFallback;
|
|
assert.equal(isDailyQuotaExhausted("You have exceeded today's quota for model X"), true);
|
|
assert.equal(isDailyQuotaExhausted("exceeded your daily quota"), true);
|
|
assert.equal(isDailyQuotaExhausted("Please try again tomorrow"), true);
|
|
assert.equal(isDailyQuotaExhausted("rate limit exceeded"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(isDailyQuotaExhausted(""), false);
|
|
assert.equal(isDailyQuotaExhausted(null), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("getMsUntilTomorrow returns positive value less than 24 hours", () => {
|
|
const { getMsUntilTomorrow } = accountFallback;
|
|
const ms = getMsUntilTomorrow();
|
|
assert.ok(ms > 0, "should be positive");
|
|
assert.ok(ms <= 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000, "should be <= 24 hours");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError locks model until tomorrow for non-429 daily quota exhaustion", () => {
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(
|
|
402,
|
|
"You have exceeded today's quota for model moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5, please try again tomorrow"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.reason, RateLimitReason.QUOTA_EXHAUSTED);
|
|
assert.equal(result.dailyQuotaExhausted, true);
|
|
assert.ok(result.cooldownMs > 0, "cooldown should be positive");
|
|
assert.ok(result.cooldownMs <= 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000, "cooldown should be <= 24 hours");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError routes API-key 429 'try again tomorrow' through resilience cooldown", () => {
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(429, "Please try again tomorrow", 0, null, "openai", null, {
|
|
baseCooldownMs: 125,
|
|
useUpstreamRetryHints: false,
|
|
maxBackoffSteps: 3,
|
|
failureThreshold: 60,
|
|
resetTimeoutMs: 5000,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.dailyQuotaExhausted, undefined);
|
|
assert.equal(result.cooldownMs, 125);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError routes API-key 429 'daily quota' text through resilience cooldown", () => {
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(
|
|
429,
|
|
"You have exceeded your daily quota",
|
|
0,
|
|
null,
|
|
"openai",
|
|
null,
|
|
{
|
|
baseCooldownMs: 125,
|
|
useUpstreamRetryHints: false,
|
|
maxBackoffSteps: 3,
|
|
failureThreshold: 60,
|
|
resetTimeoutMs: 5000,
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.dailyQuotaExhausted, undefined);
|
|
assert.equal(result.cooldownMs, 125);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("checkFallbackError preserves OAuth 429 daily quota semantics", () => {
|
|
const result = checkFallbackError(
|
|
429,
|
|
"You have exceeded your daily quota",
|
|
0,
|
|
null,
|
|
"codex",
|
|
null,
|
|
{
|
|
baseCooldownMs: 125,
|
|
useUpstreamRetryHints: false,
|
|
maxBackoffSteps: 3,
|
|
failureThreshold: 60,
|
|
resetTimeoutMs: 5000,
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(result.shouldFallback, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.reason, RateLimitReason.QUOTA_EXHAUSTED);
|
|
assert.equal(result.dailyQuotaExhausted, true);
|
|
assert.ok(result.cooldownMs > 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ModelScope daily quota lockout tests (commit 0456a1f5)
|
|
test("recordModelLockoutFailure sets cooldown until tomorrow 0:00 for quota_exhausted reason", () => {
|
|
const originalNow = Date.now;
|
|
// Use a fixed local time (noon) to ensure predictable results
|
|
const testDate = new Date();
|
|
testDate.setHours(12, 0, 0, 0); // Set to noon today
|
|
const now = testDate.getTime();
|
|
Date.now = () => now;
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
const provider = "modelscope";
|
|
const connectionId = "test-conn-modelscope-1";
|
|
const model = "qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct";
|
|
|
|
// Clear any existing state
|
|
clearModelLock(provider, connectionId, model);
|
|
|
|
const profile = {
|
|
baseCooldownMs: 125,
|
|
useUpstreamRetryHints: false,
|
|
maxBackoffSteps: 3,
|
|
failureThreshold: 60,
|
|
resetTimeoutMs: 5000,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Calculate milliseconds until tomorrow 00:00 local time
|
|
const tomorrow = new Date(now);
|
|
tomorrow.setDate(tomorrow.getDate() + 1);
|
|
tomorrow.setHours(0, 0, 0, 0);
|
|
const expectedMsUntilTomorrow = tomorrow.getTime() - now;
|
|
|
|
// Account for timezone offset: function uses local time, test env may use UTC
|
|
const timezoneOffset = new Date().getTimezoneOffset() * 60 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
// Record failure with quota_exhausted reason
|
|
const result = recordModelLockoutFailure(
|
|
provider,
|
|
connectionId,
|
|
model,
|
|
"quota_exhausted",
|
|
429,
|
|
0, // fallbackCooldownMs should be overridden to ms until tomorrow
|
|
profile
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Verify the cooldown is set to ms until tomorrow 0:00 (with tolerance)
|
|
// The cooldown should be close to expectedMsUntilTomorrow
|
|
const tolerance = 60 * 1000; // 1 minute tolerance
|
|
// Calculate difference between actual and expected values
|
|
const diff = Math.abs(result.cooldownMs - expectedMsUntilTomorrow);
|
|
|
|
// Allow ±5 minutes tolerance (300,000 ms)
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
diff <= 300_000,
|
|
`cooldown should be ms until tomorrow 0:00 (expected ${expectedMsUntilTomorrow}ms, got ${result.cooldownMs}ms, diff ${diff}ms)`
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Verify model is locked
|
|
assert.equal(isModelLocked(provider, connectionId, model), true);
|
|
|
|
const lockInfo = getModelLockoutInfo(provider, connectionId, model);
|
|
assert.ok(lockInfo !== null, "lockInfo should not be null");
|
|
assert.ok(lockInfo.remainingMs > 0, "remaining time should be positive");
|
|
|
|
clearModelLock(provider, connectionId, model);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
Date.now = originalNow;
|
|
clearModelLock("modelscope", "test-conn-modelscope-1", "qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("recordModelLockoutFailure uses regular backoff for non-quota reasons", () => {
|
|
const originalNow = Date.now;
|
|
const now = 1_700_000_000_000;
|
|
Date.now = () => now;
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
const provider = "modelscope";
|
|
const connectionId = "test-conn-modelscope-2";
|
|
const model = "qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct";
|
|
|
|
clearModelLock(provider, connectionId, model);
|
|
|
|
const profile = {
|
|
baseCooldownMs: 5000,
|
|
useUpstreamRetryHints: false,
|
|
maxBackoffSteps: 3,
|
|
failureThreshold: 60,
|
|
resetTimeoutMs: 5000,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Record failure with rate_limited reason (not quota_exhausted)
|
|
const result = recordModelLockoutFailure(
|
|
provider,
|
|
connectionId,
|
|
model,
|
|
"rate_limited",
|
|
429,
|
|
0,
|
|
profile
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Verify the cooldown uses regular profile baseCooldownMs (5000ms)
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
result.cooldownMs < 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000,
|
|
"cooldown should be less than 24h for non-quota reasons"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result.cooldownMs, 5000, "cooldown should use profile baseCooldownMs");
|
|
|
|
clearModelLock(provider, connectionId, model);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
Date.now = originalNow;
|
|
clearModelLock("modelscope", "test-conn-modelscope-2", "qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|