mirror of
https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute.git
synced 2026-09-14 02:42:24 +03:00
65e81158ab
Landed with the design call resolved per the owner's pick — **option 1**: the synced store is now endpoint-agnostic (persistDiscoveredModels and managedModelImport no longer drop non-chat models at write time), and chat selectability moved to read time (auto-pool expansion in autoStrategy applies filterChatSelectableModels; the models-route projection already had its chatOnly filter). Your discovery test now passes end-to-end (3/3): /api/show capabilities persist per connection and image/embedding requests route through the advertising host. Reconciliation notes: conflicted areas merged onto the current tip (adobe discovery import, requestedModel preflight signature, resolvedProvider fast-path coexists with the synced-route override — explicit resolution wins); carried base-red drains (#10055 memoization, #11071 test variants) dropped as already-landed; the managed-model-import exclusion test was propagated to the new contract (image/video models persist; the read filter still hides them from chat pickers — pinned by a new assertion). Full battery: 205/206 focused (the one red is a confirmed periodic-timer timing flake on the loaded devbox — 20/20 isolated), autoCombo vitest 30/30, combo suites 46/46, gates + typecheck clean. Thank you @yourspraveen — the capability probe + routing design was right; it just needed the store contract opened up. Fixes #11087.
39 lines
1.7 KiB
TypeScript
39 lines
1.7 KiB
TypeScript
import test from "node:test";
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
|
|
|
|
const pageClientSource = readFileSync(
|
|
"src/app/(dashboard)/dashboard/webhooks/WebhooksPageClient.tsx",
|
|
"utf8"
|
|
);
|
|
const wizardSource = readFileSync(
|
|
"src/app/(dashboard)/dashboard/webhooks/components/AddWebhookWizard.tsx",
|
|
"utf8"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
test("webhook edit action opens the wizard in edit mode", () => {
|
|
assert.match(pageClientSource, /const \[editingWebhook, setEditingWebhook\]/);
|
|
assert.match(pageClientSource, /const handleEditWebhook = \(webhook: WebhookItem\) => \{/);
|
|
assert.match(pageClientSource, /setEditingWebhook\(webhook\);/);
|
|
assert.match(pageClientSource, /onEdit=\{handleEditWebhook\}/);
|
|
assert.match(pageClientSource, /editingWebhook=\{editingWebhook\}/);
|
|
assert.doesNotMatch(pageClientSource, /onEdit=\{\(\) => setWizardOpen\(true\)\}/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("webhook wizard title reflects add versus edit mode", () => {
|
|
assert.match(wizardSource, /editingWebhook\?: WebhookItem \| null;/);
|
|
assert.match(wizardSource, /const isEditing = Boolean\(editingWebhook\);/);
|
|
assert.match(wizardSource, /title=\{`\$\{t\(isEditing \? "editWebhook" : "addWebhook"\)\}/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("editing an existing webhook reuses the current webhook payload", () => {
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
wizardSource,
|
|
/function stateFromWebhook\(webhook: WebhookItem \| null \| undefined\)/
|
|
);
|
|
assert.match(wizardSource, /setState\(stateFromWebhook\(editingWebhook\)\);/);
|
|
assert.match(wizardSource, /setCreatedId\(editingWebhook\?\.id \?\? null\);/);
|
|
assert.match(wizardSource, /\.\.\.buildConfigPayload\(\),/);
|
|
assert.match(wizardSource, /step2Valid\(state, isEditing\)/);
|
|
});
|