Files
OmniRoute/tests/unit/active-request-stream-chunks-lifecycle.test.ts
Diego Rodrigues de Sa e Souza 8169b97d84 Release v3.8.18 (#3482)
* chore(release): open v3.8.18 development cycle

* fix(catalog): stop Codex CLI model-catalog refresh from erroring (#3481)

Codex's model-catalog refresh (codex_models_manager) does
GET /v1/models?client_version=<v> and decodes a JSON object with a
TOP-LEVEL `models` array. OmniRoute answers in the OpenAI-standard
`{object,data}` shape, so codex fails with "missing field `models`"
and logs "failed to refresh available models" on every startup.

Detect codex clients via the `originator` / `user-agent` = `codex_*`
headers they send and add an EMPTY top-level `models: []` so the decode
succeeds. Non-codex OpenAI clients keep the byte-identical `{object,data}`
response.

The array is intentionally empty: codex replaces its built-in per-model
agent prompt (`base_instructions`, ~21k chars) with whatever a populated
entry carries for the selected model, so emitting our catalog would drop
the agent prompt to nothing and break codex's agent behaviour (verified
empirically against codex 0.137). An empty list keeps codex on its
built-in model info — same inference as before, minus the error.

Validated end-to-end with the real handler against codex 0.137:
"failed to refresh available models" → 0 occurrences, instructions
preserved (built-in Codex agent prompt, not empty).

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: ignore quality reports and local prompt artifacts

Add generated quality gate reports, metrics files, and local setup prompt
artifacts to .gitignore to prevent committing environment-specific or
temporary files.

* fix(provider): detect Responses API format when body has `input` but … (#3490)

Integrated into release/v3.8.18

* fix(sse): normalize numeric provider ids to strings (#3451)

Integrated into release/v3.8.18

* feat(browserPool): resolve Playwright proxy from proxy_registry DB (#3492)

Integrated into release/v3.8.18

* fix(theoldllm): generate X-Request-Token server-side, drop Playwright (#3491)

Integrated into release/v3.8.18

* feat(plugins): add lifecycle hooks and theme-manager plugin (#3473)

Integrated into release/v3.8.18

* fix(combo): parallel pre-screen + circuit-breaker fast-exit for priority combos (#3169)

Integrated into release/v3.8.18

* feat(ui): unifi active and finished requests into single view #1422 (#3401)

Integrated into release/v3.8.18

* docs(changelog): record #3401, #3473, #3492, #3490, #3451, #3491, #3169 under v3.8.18

* feat(docs): add doc accuracy gate + refresh AGENTS.md counts (#3510)

Integrated into release/v3.8.18

* fix(sse): drop empty-choices chunks without usage instead of injecting retry text (#3513)

PR #3422 ('allow OpenAI usage-only empty choices chunks') reintroduced the
assistant-content injection '[OmniRoute] Upstream returned an empty response.
Please retry.' for empty `choices: []` chunks that carry no valid usage. Clients
(Goose/opencode) feed that text back as a turn and spin in a retry loop -- the
exact regression #3400 had fixed by dropping the chunk.

Restore the drop behavior for the no-usage case while preserving #3422's
standards-compliant forwarding of usage-only `include_usage` final chunks.
Realign the mislabeled stream-utils test (it asserted the injection) and add a
dedicated regression guard.

Reported-by: @mochizzan
Refs: #3502, #3388, #3400, #3422

* fix(authz): fall back to URL token when Authorization isn't a usable Bearer (#3504)

Integrated into release/v3.8.18

* fix(playground): authenticate via session, test key policy by id (#3503)

Integrated into release/v3.8.18

* docs(changelog): record #3510, #3504, #3503 under v3.8.18

* fix: llama base url normalization (#3519)

* docs(changelog): reconcile v3.8.18 — add #3519, #3513, #3435-repair, gitignore chore (full commit↔changelog coverage)

* fix(opencode-plugin): bound regex quantifiers in normaliseFreeLabel (polynomial-ReDoS)

CodeQL js/polynomial-redos: unbounded \s* before an anchored \s*$ allowed
O(n²) backtracking on attacker-influenced display names. Bounded to {0,8}/{1,8}
(ample for any real label spacing). Plugin builds + 254 tests green.

* fix(types): restore clean typecheck:core for v3.8.18 release gate

- getPendingRequests() typed to real shape (was widened to object) → fixes
  unknown 'count' in the unified-requests view (#3401)
- streamChunks log payload cast to its declared type (callLogs.ts)
- preScreenTargets aligned to canonical IsModelAvailable signature (#3169),
  Promise.resolve-normalized so .catch never hits a bare boolean

All 5 gates green: lint(0 err) + typecheck:core + cycles + docs-all + unit + vitest(146).

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrey Borodulin <borodulin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Safronov <zimniy@cyberbrain.cc>
Co-authored-by: Paijo <14921983+oyi77@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: PizzaV <103120356+pizzav-xyz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Markus Hartung <mail@hartmark.se>
Co-authored-by: Felipe Almeman <4226997+zhiru@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-09 15:56:24 -03:00

661 lines
23 KiB
TypeScript

import test from "node:test";
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
import fs from "node:fs";
import os from "node:os";
import path from "node:path";
const TEST_DATA_DIR = fs.mkdtempSync(
path.join(os.tmpdir(), "omniroute-active-stream-lifecycle-")
);
process.env.DATA_DIR = TEST_DATA_DIR;
const core = await import("../../src/lib/db/core.ts");
const usageHistory = await import("../../src/lib/usage/usageHistory.ts");
const callLogs = await import("../../src/lib/usage/callLogs.ts");
test.after(() => {
core.resetDbInstance();
fs.rmSync(TEST_DATA_DIR, { recursive: true, force: true });
});
// ─── Helper: Simulates /api/logs/[id] API route logic ──────────────────────
//
// The production route uses 3-tier lookup:
// 1. DB (getCallLogById)
// 2. completedDetails in-memory cache (getCompletedDetails)
// 3. pendingById in-memory active requests (getPendingById)
//
// Each tier constructs the API response shape including pipelinePayloads.
function buildApiResponseFromPending(id: string): Record<string, unknown> | null {
const active = usageHistory.getPendingById().get(id);
if (!active) return null;
const pipelinePayloads: Record<string, unknown> = {
clientRequest: active.clientRequest ?? null,
providerRequest: active.providerRequest ?? null,
providerResponse: active.providerResponse ?? null,
clientResponse: active.clientResponse ?? null,
streamChunks: active.streamChunks ?? null,
};
return {
id: active.id,
timestamp: new Date(active.startedAt).toISOString(),
method: "",
path: active.clientEndpoint || "",
status: 0,
model: active.model,
provider: active.provider,
connectionId: active.connectionId,
duration: Date.now() - active.startedAt,
detailState: "in-flight",
active: true,
pipelinePayloads,
hasPipelineDetails: true,
};
}
function buildApiResponseFromCompleted(id: string): Record<string, unknown> | null {
const completed = usageHistory.getCompletedDetails();
const inMem = completed.get(id);
if (!inMem) return null;
const pipelinePayloads: Record<string, unknown> = {
clientRequest: inMem.clientRequest ?? null,
providerRequest: inMem.providerRequest ?? null,
providerResponse: inMem.providerResponse ?? null,
clientResponse: inMem.clientResponse ?? null,
streamChunks: inMem.streamChunks ?? null,
};
return {
id: inMem.id,
timestamp: new Date(inMem.startedAt).toISOString(),
path: inMem.clientEndpoint || "",
status: 0,
model: inMem.model,
provider: inMem.provider,
connectionId: inMem.connectionId,
duration: Date.now() - inMem.startedAt,
detailState: "in-memory",
active: false,
pipelinePayloads,
hasPipelineDetails: true,
};
}
// ─── Helper: Simulates frontend streamChunksText IIFE ──────────────────────
function computeStreamChunksText(
debugEnabled: boolean,
pipelinePayloads: Record<string, unknown> | null | undefined
): string | null {
if (!debugEnabled || !pipelinePayloads?.streamChunks) return null;
let chunks: unknown = pipelinePayloads.streamChunks;
if (typeof chunks === "string") {
try {
chunks = JSON.parse(chunks);
} catch {
return chunks;
}
}
if (chunks && typeof chunks === "object") {
try {
return Object.entries(chunks as Record<string, unknown>)
.map(([stage, arr]) => {
const joined = Array.isArray(arr) ? (arr as string[]).join("") : String(arr);
return `--- ${stage} ---\n${joined}`;
})
.join("\n\n");
} catch {
return JSON.stringify(chunks, null, 2);
}
}
return null;
}
// ─── Helper: Simulates frontend openDetail state merge ─────────────────────
function mergeDetailData(
prev: Record<string, unknown> | null,
data: Record<string, unknown>
): Record<string, unknown> {
const dataHasPipeline =
data?.pipelinePayloads &&
Object.keys(data.pipelinePayloads || {}).length > 0;
return {
...prev,
...data,
pipelinePayloads: dataHasPipeline
? data.pipelinePayloads
: prev?.pipelinePayloads,
};
}
// ─── Test: Full lifecycle ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
test("streamChunks survive the full lifecycle: in-flight → completed → persisted", async () => {
usageHistory.clearPendingRequests();
const model = "gpt-4";
const provider = "openai";
const connectionId = "conn-lifecycle-1";
// ── Phase 1: Track a pending request ──
const requestId = usageHistory.trackPendingRequest(
model,
provider,
connectionId,
true,
{
clientRequest: { messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hello" }] },
providerRequest: { model: "gpt-4" },
clientEndpoint: "/v1/chat/completions",
}
);
assert.ok(requestId, "trackPendingRequest should return a request ID");
assert.ok(
usageHistory.getPendingById().has(requestId),
"request ID should be in pendingById immediately"
);
// ── Phase 2: Simulate streaming — chunks arrive gradually ──
// Round 1: provider chunks
usageHistory.updatePendingRequestStreamChunks(model, provider, connectionId, {
provider: ['data: {"type":"message_start"}\n\n'],
openai: [],
client: [],
});
// Verify via pendingById (what the API reads)
const apiResponse1 = buildApiResponseFromPending(requestId);
assert.ok(apiResponse1, "API should find in-flight request");
assert.ok(apiResponse1!.pipelinePayloads, "should have pipelinePayloads");
assert.ok(
(apiResponse1!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>).streamChunks,
"streamChunks should be present in API response"
);
// Simulate frontend streamChunksText
const text1 = computeStreamChunksText(
true,
apiResponse1!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>
);
assert.ok(text1, "streamChunksText should be non-null with debugEnabled");
assert.ok(
text1!.includes("message_start"),
"streamChunksText should contain the chunk content"
);
// Verify frontend state merge
const initialDetail = mergeDetailData(null, apiResponse1 as unknown as Record<string, unknown>);
assert.ok(
(initialDetail.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>).streamChunks,
"streamChunks should survive the openDetail state merge"
);
const text1after = computeStreamChunksText(
true,
initialDetail.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>
);
assert.ok(text1after, "streamChunksText should work after state merge");
assert.ok(text1after!.includes("message_start"), "content preserved after state merge");
// Round 2: openai chunks arrive (simulating proxy relay)
usageHistory.updatePendingRequestStreamChunks(model, provider, connectionId, {
provider: ['data: {"type":"message_start"}\n\n'],
openai: ['data: {"choices":[{"delta":{"content":"Hello"}}]}\n\n'],
client: [],
});
// Round 3: client (converted) chunk arrives
usageHistory.updatePendingRequestStreamChunks(model, provider, connectionId, {
provider: ['data: {"type":"message_start"}\n\n'],
openai: ['data: {"choices":[{"delta":{"content":"Hello"}}]}\n\n'],
client: ['data: {"content":"Hello"}\n\n'],
});
// Verify API sees the latest (shows all stages now)
const apiResponse2 = buildApiResponseFromPending(requestId);
const streamChunks2 = (apiResponse2!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>)
.streamChunks as Record<string, string[]>;
assert.equal(streamChunks2.provider.length, 1, "provider chunks: 1");
assert.equal(streamChunks2.openai.length, 1, "openai chunks: 1");
assert.equal(streamChunks2.client.length, 1, "client chunks: 1");
// Verify frontend text includes all 3 stages
const text2 = computeStreamChunksText(
true,
apiResponse2!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>
);
assert.ok(text2!.includes("--- provider ---"), "should include provider stage");
assert.ok(text2!.includes("--- openai ---"), "should include openai stage");
assert.ok(text2!.includes("--- client ---"), "should include client stage");
// Verify debugEnabled=false hides the stream
const textHidden = computeStreamChunksText(
false,
apiResponse2!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>
);
assert.equal(textHidden, null, "streamChunksText should be null when debugEnabled=false");
// Verify null pipelinePayloads hides the stream
const textNoPayload = computeStreamChunksText(true, null);
assert.equal(textNoPayload, null, "streamChunksText should be null without pipelinePayloads");
const textNoChunks = computeStreamChunksText(true, {});
assert.equal(textNoChunks, null, "streamChunksText should be null without streamChunks key");
// ── Phase 3: Simulate request completion ──
usageHistory.finalizeMostRecentPendingRequest(model, provider, connectionId, {
status: 200,
model,
provider,
clientResponse: { choices: [{ message: { content: "Hello" } }] },
});
// The request should be in completedDetails now
assert.ok(
!usageHistory.getPendingById().has(requestId),
"request should be removed from pendingById after finalization"
);
const completedResponse = buildApiResponseFromCompleted(requestId);
assert.ok(completedResponse, "API should find request in completedDetails");
assert.ok(
(completedResponse!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>).streamChunks,
"streamChunks should be in completedDetails"
);
// Verify frontend can render from completed response
const completedText = computeStreamChunksText(
true,
completedResponse!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>
);
assert.ok(completedText, "streamChunksText should work from completed data");
assert.ok(completedText!.includes("Hello"), "content preserved after completion");
// ── Phase 4: Persist to DB (simulates saveCallLog) ──
await callLogs.saveCallLog({
id: requestId,
method: "POST",
path: "/v1/chat/completions",
status: 200,
model,
requestedModel: model,
provider,
connectionId,
duration: 5000,
tokens: { in: 10, out: 20 },
requestBody: { messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hello" }] },
responseBody: { choices: [{ message: { content: "Hello" } }] },
error: null,
sourceFormat: "openai",
targetFormat: "openai",
comboName: null,
comboStepId: null,
comboExecutionKey: null,
tokensCompressed: null,
cacheSource: "upstream",
apiKeyId: null,
apiKeyName: null,
noLog: false,
pipelinePayloads: completedResponse!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>,
});
// Verify DB has the entry
const dbEntry = await callLogs.getCallLogById(requestId);
assert.ok(dbEntry, "should find persisted call log by the same ID");
assert.ok(
dbEntry.pipelinePayloads,
"persisted entry should have pipelinePayloads"
);
// The pipelinePayloads in the DB may have been compacted/truncated.
// streamChunks may or may not be there depending on captureStreamChunks,
// but the ID must match so the API can find it.
assert.equal(
(dbEntry as Record<string, unknown>).id,
requestId,
"DB entry ID should match the original request ID"
);
});
test("streamChunksText renders progressive updates correctly", () => {
// Simulate the scenario where streamChunks grows between polls
// Poll 1: first chunk arrives
const payload1 = {
streamChunks: { provider: ['data: {"content":"A"}\n\n'], openai: [], client: [] },
};
const text1 = computeStreamChunksText(true, payload1);
assert.ok(text1, "poll 1 should produce text");
assert.ok(text1!.includes("A"), "poll 1 should show chunk A");
// Poll 2: second chunk appended
const payload2 = {
streamChunks: {
provider: ['data: {"content":"A"}\n\n', 'data: {"content":"B"}\n\n'],
openai: [],
client: [],
},
};
const text2 = computeStreamChunksText(true, payload2);
assert.ok(text2!.includes("A"), "poll 2 should still show chunk A");
assert.ok(text2!.includes("B"), "poll 2 should show newly arrived chunk B");
// The joined text should be the concatenation
assert.ok(
text2!.includes('data: {"content":"A"}\n\ndata: {"content":"B"}'),
"poll 2 joined text should contain both chunks"
);
});
test("pooling effect state merge preserves streamChunks across updates", () => {
// Simulate the polling useEffect state merge:
// setDetailData(prev => ({...prev, ...data, pipelinePayloads: data?.pipelinePayloads || prev?.pipelinePayloads}))
let detailData: Record<string, unknown> | null = null;
// openDetail initial fetch
const initialFetch = {
pipelinePayloads: {
streamChunks: { provider: ['data: {"a":1}\n\n'] },
providerRequest: { model: "gpt-4" },
},
active: true,
detailState: "in-flight",
};
detailData = mergeDetailData(null, initialFetch);
assert.ok(
(detailData!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>).streamChunks,
"initial merge should preserve streamChunks"
);
// Poll response adds more chunks
const pollResponse = {
pipelinePayloads: {
streamChunks: {
provider: ['data: {"a":1}\n\n', 'data: {"b":2}\n\n'],
},
providerRequest: { model: "gpt-4" },
},
active: true,
detailState: "in-flight",
};
detailData = mergeDetailData(detailData, pollResponse);
const mergedChunks = (detailData!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>)
.streamChunks as Record<string, string[]>;
assert.equal(mergedChunks.provider.length, 2, "merged should have 2 chunks");
assert.equal(
mergedChunks.provider[1],
'data: {"b":2}\n\n',
"merged should include new chunk"
);
// Simulate: polling response loses pipelinePayloads (null)
// This should NOT overwrite the existing streamChunks
const nullPayloadResponse = {
pipelinePayloads: null,
active: true,
detailState: "in-flight",
};
const afterNullPayload = mergeDetailData(detailData, nullPayloadResponse);
assert.ok(
(afterNullPayload.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>).streamChunks,
"streamChunks should survive null pipelinePayloads update"
);
// Simulate: polling response has pipelinePayloads but NO streamChunks
// This SHOULD overwrite (|| semantics) — but the production condition is: when
// data?.pipelinePayloads is truthy, it replaces prev. If captureStreamChunks was false,
// the data won't have streamChunks. This is expected behavior — the frontend doesn't
// try to retain old streamChunks when new data explicitly lacks them.
const noChunksPayloadResponse = {
pipelinePayloads: {
providerResponse: { status: 200 },
// no streamChunks key
},
active: false,
detailState: "ready",
};
const afterNoChunks = mergeDetailData(detailData, noChunksPayloadResponse);
const payloadAfter = afterNoChunks.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>;
assert.equal(
payloadAfter.streamChunks,
undefined,
"streamChunks is lost when new pipelinePayloads lacks it and is truthy"
);
// This demonstrates the || semantics: data.pipelinePayloads is truthy ({providerResponse: {...}})
// so it replaces prev.pipelinePayloads even though it lacks streamChunks.
// The Event Stream section will not render after this update.
// However, in practice this only happens after request completion when the polling
// transitions to the persisted artifact which may have truncated streamChunks.
// By that point the Event Stream section is no longer needed (streaming is done).
});
test("pendingById references are live: push mutates the shared arrays visible to API", () => {
usageHistory.clearPendingRequests();
const model = "gpt-4";
const provider = "openai";
const connectionId = "conn-ref-1";
const requestId = usageHistory.trackPendingRequest(model, provider, connectionId, true);
// Simulate push() — store initial empty arrays
usageHistory.updatePendingRequestStreamChunks(model, provider, connectionId, {
provider: [],
openai: [],
client: [],
});
// Get the pending detail reference
const detailFromPending = usageHistory.getPendingById().get(requestId);
assert.ok(detailFromPending, "detail should be in pendingById");
assert.ok(detailFromPending!.streamChunks, "streamChunks should be set to wrapper object");
// Simulate appendBoundedChunk — pushes to the shared array
detailFromPending!.streamChunks!.provider.push('data: {"chunk":"live"}');
// Re-read from pendingById — should see the mutation
const detailReRead = usageHistory.getPendingById().get(requestId);
assert.equal(
detailReRead!.streamChunks!.provider.length,
1,
"mutation should be visible through pendingById"
);
assert.equal(
detailReRead!.streamChunks!.provider[0],
'data: {"chunk":"live"}',
"mutated content should be visible through pendingById"
);
// Verify via simulated API response
const apiResp = buildApiResponseFromPending(requestId);
const apiChunks = (apiResp!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>)
.streamChunks as Record<string, string[]>;
assert.equal(apiChunks.provider.length, 1, "API should see the live mutation");
});
test("no connectionId in request logger does not break anything", async () => {
const { createRequestLogger } = await import(
"../../open-sse/utils/requestLogger.ts"
);
usageHistory.clearPendingRequests();
usageHistory.trackPendingRequest("gpt-4", "openai", "conn-noop-1", true);
// Logger without connectionId/model — push() bails, no crash
const logger = await createRequestLogger("openai", "openai", "gpt-4", {
enabled: true,
captureStreamChunks: true,
});
logger.appendProviderChunk('data: {"a":1}');
logger.appendOpenAIChunk('data: {"b":2}');
logger.appendConvertedChunk('data: {"c":3}');
// The pending detail should NOT have streamChunks (no connectionId match)
const pending = usageHistory.getPendingRequests();
const detail = pending.details["conn-noop-1"]?.["gpt-4 (openai)"]?.[0];
assert.equal(detail.streamChunks, undefined, "streamChunks should not be set");
// Simulated API should return null for streamChunks
const apiResp = buildApiResponseFromPending(
// We need the actual ID. trackPendingRequest returns it now.
(() => {
usageHistory.clearPendingRequests();
const id = usageHistory.trackPendingRequest("gpt-4", "openai", "conn-noop-2", true);
return id!;
})()
);
// This request had no streaming, so streamChunks is null
if (apiResp) {
const noChunks = computeStreamChunksText(
true,
apiResp.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>
);
assert.equal(noChunks, null, "no streamChunks means no event stream");
}
});
test("createRequestLogger and trackPendingRequest with matching model propagate streamChunks", async () => {
// The fix: chatCore.ts now passes `model` (not `effectiveModel`) to
// createRequestLogger, so the modelKey matches what trackPendingRequest uses.
const { createRequestLogger } = await import(
"../../open-sse/utils/requestLogger.ts"
);
usageHistory.clearPendingRequests();
const model = "gpt-4";
const provider = "openai";
const connectionId = "conn-match-1";
const requestId = usageHistory.trackPendingRequest(
model, provider, connectionId, true,
{ clientRequest: { messages: [] } }
);
// Use matching model (the fix)
const logger = await createRequestLogger("openai", "openai", model, {
enabled: true,
captureStreamChunks: true,
model,
provider,
connectionId,
});
logger.appendProviderChunk('data: {"chunk":"hello"}');
logger.appendOpenAIChunk('data: {"choices":[{"delta":{"content":"hi"}}]}');
logger.appendConvertedChunk('data: {"content":"world"}');
const detail = usageHistory.getPendingById().get(requestId);
assert.ok(detail, "pending detail should exist");
assert.ok(detail!.streamChunks, "streamChunks should be set");
assert.equal(detail!.streamChunks!.provider.length, 1);
assert.equal(detail!.streamChunks!.openai.length, 1);
assert.equal(detail!.streamChunks!.client.length, 1);
const apiResp = buildApiResponseFromPending(requestId!);
assert.ok(apiResp);
const apiChunks = (apiResp!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>).streamChunks as Record<string, string[]>;
assert.equal(apiChunks?.provider[0], 'data: {"chunk":"hello"}');
});
test("streamChunks in completedDetails survives 5-second TTL window", async () => {
usageHistory.clearPendingRequests();
const model = "gpt-4";
const provider = "openai";
const connectionId = "conn-ttl-1";
const requestId = usageHistory.trackPendingRequest(model, provider, connectionId, true, {
clientRequest: { messages: [] },
});
// Simulate streaming then completion
usageHistory.updatePendingRequestStreamChunks(model, provider, connectionId, {
provider: ['data: {"chunk":"final"}\n\n'],
openai: [],
client: [],
});
usageHistory.finalizeMostRecentPendingRequest(model, provider, connectionId, {
status: 200,
model,
provider,
});
// Should be in completedDetails
assert.ok(
usageHistory.getCompletedDetails().has(requestId),
"should be in completedDetails after finalization"
);
const completedResp = buildApiResponseFromCompleted(requestId);
assert.ok(completedResp, "API response should be available from completedDetails");
assert.ok(
(completedResp!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>).streamChunks,
"streamChunks should be in completedDetails"
);
// The completedDetails TTL is 5000ms. We verify by saving to DB first, then
// waiting for the TTL to expire, then verifying the data is gone from
// completedDetails but still accessible from the DB (via getCallLogById).
// Save to DB
await callLogs.saveCallLog({
id: requestId,
method: "POST",
path: "/v1/chat/completions",
status: 200,
model,
requestedModel: model,
provider,
connectionId,
duration: 3000,
tokens: { in: 5, out: 10 },
requestBody: {},
responseBody: {},
error: null,
sourceFormat: "openai",
targetFormat: "openai",
comboName: null,
comboStepId: null,
comboExecutionKey: null,
tokensCompressed: null,
cacheSource: "upstream",
apiKeyId: null,
apiKeyName: null,
noLog: false,
pipelinePayloads: completedResp!.pipelinePayloads as Record<string, unknown>,
});
// Verify DB has it
const dbEntry1 = await callLogs.getCallLogById(requestId);
assert.ok(dbEntry1, "DB should have the entry after saveCallLog");
// Wait for TTL to expire
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 5100));
// completedDetails should be cleared
assert.ok(
!usageHistory.getCompletedDetails().has(requestId),
"completedDetails should have been cleared after TTL"
);
// But DB should still have it
const dbEntry2 = await callLogs.getCallLogById(requestId);
assert.ok(dbEntry2, "DB should still have the entry after TTL expiry");
assert.equal(
(dbEntry2 as Record<string, unknown>).id,
requestId,
"DB entry ID should match the original request ID"
);
});