mirror of
https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute.git
synced 2026-09-18 21:02:50 +03:00
test: expect the jina alias prefix in the custom-model catalog case
The custom-model assertions expected ids prefixed `jina-ai/`, but the catalog prefixes model ids with the provider alias, which is `jina`. The synced-model test directly above asserts `jina/` and passes, so the two cases contradicted each other within the same file. The expectation predates the alias: the test was written in v3.7.9 (2026-05-04) and `alias: "jina"` was added in v3.8.36 (2026-06-25). Aligns the two assertions with the sibling test and with the product. The file now passes 44/44 (was 43 with 1 failure). Confirmed the assertions still bite: renaming the alias to `jina-XX` fails exactly these two cases.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1092,9 +1092,9 @@ test("v1 models catalog does not duplicate custom Jina specialty models", async
|
||||
|
||||
assert.equal(response.status, 200);
|
||||
assert.equal(visibleJinaEmbeddingRows.length, 1);
|
||||
assert.equal(visibleJinaEmbeddingRows[0].id, "jina-ai/jina-embeddings-v5-text-small");
|
||||
assert.equal(visibleJinaEmbeddingRows[0].id, "jina/jina-embeddings-v5-text-small");
|
||||
assert.equal(visibleJinaRerankRows.length, 1);
|
||||
assert.equal(visibleJinaRerankRows[0].id, "jina-ai/jina-reranker-v3");
|
||||
assert.equal(visibleJinaRerankRows[0].id, "jina/jina-reranker-v3");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("v1 models catalog exposes image model input and output modalities for advanced image providers", async () => {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user